Links & Downloads
Res. Biomed. Eng. 2017; 33
10.1590/2446-4740.07116 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2446-4740.07116
Abstract:Introduction: To analyze edge detection and optical contrast calculation of light field-indicators used in X-ray via automated- and observer-based methods, and comparison with current standard approaches, which do not give exact definition for light field edge determination. Methods: Automated light sensor array was used to measure the penumbra zone of the edge in the standard X-ray equipment, while trained and naïve human observers were asked to mark the light field edge according to their own determination. Different interpretations of the contrast were then calculated and compared. Results: In contrast to automated measurements of edge definition and detection, measurements by human observers showed large inter-observer variation independent of their training with X-ray equipment. Different contrast calculations considering the different edge definitions gave very different contrast values. Conclusion: As the main conclusion, we propose a more exact edge definition of the X-ray light field, corresponding well to the average human observer’s edge determination. The new edge definition method with automated systems would reduce human variability in edge determination. Such errors could potentially affect the approval of X-ray equipment, and also increase the radiation dose. The automated measurement based on human observers’ edge definition and the corresponding contrast calculation may lead to a more precise light field calibration, which enables reduced irradiation doses on radiology patients.
Keywords:Diagnostic X-ray, Light field indicator, Edge determination, Radiation protection, X-ray equipment type test
Balderson MJ, Spencer DP, Nygren I, Brown DW. Quality assurance using a photodiode array. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 2011; 12(2):191-200. PMid:21587181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i2.3358.
Brookfield H, Manning-Stanley A, England A. Light beam diaphragm collimation errors and their effects on radiation dose for pelvic radiography. Radiologic Technology. 2015; 86(4):379-91. PMid:25835404.
Davidson M, Whiteside JA. Human brightness perception near sharp contours. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 1971; 61(4):530-6. PMid:5546717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.61.000530.
Food and Drug Administration. Code of Federal Regulations Title 21. Food and Drugs. Part 1020. Performance Standard for Ionizing Radiation Emitting Products [Internet]. Maryland: FDA; 2015. Section 1020.31. Radiographic Equipment. [cited 2017 May 01]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch. cfm?fr=1020.31.
Grossberg S, Mingolla E. Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. Psychological Review. 1985; 92(2):173-211. PMid:3887450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.2.173.
International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 60601-2-54:2009 - medical electrical equipment. particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of X-ray equipment for radiography and radioscopy. Genebra: IEC; 2009.
Kisielewicz K, Truszkiewicz A, Wach S, Wasilewska-Radwańska M. Evaluation of dose area product vs. patient dose in diagnostic X-ray units. Physica Medica. 2011; 27(2):117-20. PMid:20674429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2010.07.001.
Kron T, Ferguson S. Where is the light field edge: perception of different operators on different surfaces. Medical Dosimetry. 2000; 25(2):99-103. PMid:10856689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0958-3947(00)00036-4.
MacEvoy SP, Kim WJ, Paradiso MA. Integration of surface information in primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience. 1998; 1(7):616-20. PMid:10196570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/2849.
Woo MK, McParland CS. An optical edge detector for the accurate delineation of the light field in radiotherapy machines. Medical Physics. 2001; 28(8):1791-2. PMid:11548951. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.1388537.