AACVOX: mobile application for augmentative alternative communication to help people with speech disorder and motor impairment
Diego Pereira da Silva, Flavio Cezar Amate, Felipe Rodrigues Martinêz Basile, Cesário Bianchi Filho, Silvia Cristina Martini Rodrigues, Marcia Aparecida Silva Bissaco.
Introduction: Communication is a fundamental element for the development of human beings, promoting their coexistence in society. However, changes in muscle tone, associated with cerebral palsy (CP), among other conditions, cause phono-articulatory dysfunctions hindering speech capabilities. Although there are resources for augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), most of them do not completely satisfy the needs of individuals with motor impairment. Therefore, this study proposes a tool based on mobile technology for AAC, which can be adapted to the characteristics of the motor limitations of CP users.
Methods: Mobile system development was conducted employing user-centered design and development methods. Functions were developed allowing the communication of phrases
through pictographic resources and a mechanism of speech synthesis, that can be customized according to specific communication needs. To validate this system, 20 CP volunteers with speech difficulties and motor impairment were recruited from two institutions in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. They operated the system following a pre-defined test protocol, and they answered a system usability scale (SUS) questionnaire, to rate the ease of learning, memorization, efficiency, occurrence of runtime errors, and the level of user satisfaction.
Results: The results showed a score of 85.85 ± 2.28 above the average SUS scale, for each one of the quality components assessed by the volunteers.
Conclusion: The developed software is user-friendly, representing a new option for AAC, and is customized according to the communication needs of people with speech disorder and motor impairment.
Abras C, Maloney-Krichmar D, Preece J. User-centered design. In: Bainbridge W, editor. Encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2004. p. 445-56.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Augmentative and alternative communication: knowledge and skills for service delivery [internet]. Rockville: ASHA; 2002. [cited 2016 Feb 04]. Available from: http://www.asha.org/policy/ks2002-00067.htm
Aragonese Portal of Augmentative and Alternative Communication [internet]. Madrid: ARASAAC; 2018. [cited 2018 Apr 05]. Available from: www.arasaac.org
Bangor A, Kortum PT, Miller JT. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2008; 24(6):574-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776.
Basile FRM, Silva DP, Amate FC. Mobile application to aid people with speech disorders. J. Health Inform. 2014; 6(2):5-41.
Bax M, Goldstein M, Rosenbaum P, Leviton A, Paneth N, Dan B, Jacobsson B, Damiano D. Proposed definition and classification of cerebral palsy, April 2005. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005; 47(8):571-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S001216220500112X. PMid:16108461.
Bax M, Tydeman C, Flodmark C. Clinical and MRI correlates of cerebral palsy: the European cerebral palsy study. JAMA. 2006; 296(13):1602-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.13.1602. PMid:17018805.
Bordenave JD. O que é comunicação. 8th ed. São Paulo: Brasiliense; 2002.
Caron J, Light J, Drager K. Operational Demands of AAC mobile technology applications on programming vocabulary and engagement during professional and child interactions. Augment Altern Commun. 2016; 32(1):12-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1126636. PMid:26694519.
Cook AM, Polgar JM. Assistive technologies: principles and practice. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2014.
Ghatkamble R, Son J, Park D. A design and implementation of smartphone-based AAC system. J. Korea Inst. Inf. Commun. Eng. 2014; 18(8):1895-903. http://dx.doi.org/10.6109/jkiice.2014.18.8.1895.
Hornero G, Conde D, Quílez M, Domingo S, Rodríguez MP, Romero B, Casas O. A wireless augmentative and alternative communication system for people with speech disabilities. IEEE Access. 2015; 3(1):1288-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2466110.
Huertas JL, Nohama P. Falante: aplicativo de auxílio à fala baseado em tecnologia Android. In: Proceedings of the 24º Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia Biomédica (CBEB); 2014 Oct 17-19; Uberlândia, MG. Uberlândia: CBEB; 2014. p. 2821-4.
International Data Corporation. Worldwide quarterly mobile phone tracker [internet]. Framingham: IDC; 2015. [cited 2016 Feb 20]. Available from: http://www.idc.com/prodserv/smartphone-os-market-share.jsp
Light J, McNaughton D. The changing face of augmentative and alternative communication: past, present, and future challenges. Augment Altern Commun. 2012; 28(4):197-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2012.737024. PMid:23256853.
Loja LFB, Gomide RS, Mendes FF, Teixeira RAG, Lemos RP, Flôres EL. A concept-environment for computer-based augmentative and alternative communication founded on a systematic review. Res Biomed Eng. 2015; 31(3):257-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2446-4740.0601.
Lubas M, Mitchell J, De Leo G. User-centered design and augmentative and alternative communication apps for children with autism spectrum disorders. SAGE Open. 2014; 4(2):1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2158244014537501.
Manrique AL, Brito Kozma EV, Tadeu Dirani EA, Silva ML, Frere AF. ICTs in the classroom, multiliteracy and special education: a required interface. Creat Educ. 2016; 7(7):963-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.77100.
McNaughton D, Light J. The iPad and mobile technology revolution: benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun. 2013; 29(2):107-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.784930. PMid:23705813.
Mendes M, Correia S. Combining research, theory and end user experiments for suitable AAC apps. In: Encarnação P, Azevedo L, Gelderblom GJ, Newell A, Mathiassen NE, editors. Assistive technology: from research to practice. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2013. p. 340-6.
Nielsen J. Usability 101: introduction to usability [internet]. Fremont: Nielsen Norman Group; 2012. [cited 2015 July 15]. Available from: http://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability
Nunes LR. Linguagem e comunicação alternativa [thesis]. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; 2002.
Palmeiras GB, Bettinelli LA, Pasqualotti A. Uso de dispositivo móvel para comunicação alternativa de pacientes em cuidados intensivos. Rev. Eletronica Comun. Inf. Inov. Saude. 2013; 7(2):1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3395/reciis.v7i2.Sup1.754pt.
Pressman RS. Software engineering: a practitioner’s approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.
Quintela MA, Correia S, Mendes M. Augmentative and alternative communication: Vox4all® presentation. In: Proceedings of the 8th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI); 2013 June 19-22; Lisboa, Portugal. Lisboa: IEEE; 2013. p. 1-6.
Reyes J, Rodriguez AN, Umali ED, Solamo R, Feria R. Evaluation of a mobile AAC application for Filipino language. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Application; 2014 July 7-9; Chania, Greece. Chania: IEEE; 2014. p. 137-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IISA.2014.6878789.
Richter JG, Becker A, Koch T, Nixdorf M, Willers R, Monser R, Schacher B, Alten R, Specker C, Schneider M. Self-assessments of patients via Tablet PC in routine patient care: comparison with standardised paper questionnaires. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008; 67(12):1739-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.090209. PMid:18647853
Santos AF. Paralisia cerebral: uma revisão da literatura. Unimontes Científica. 2014; 16(2):67-82.
Scardovelli TA, Frère AF. The design and evaluation of a peripheral device for use with a computer game intended for children with motor disabilities. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2015; 118(1):44-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.10.002. PMid:25459524.
Schirmer CR. Acessibilidade na comunicação é um direito-comunicação alternativa é um caminho. Teias. 2009; 9(18):9.
Schlosser RW, Koul RK. Speech output technologies in interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a scoping review. Augment Altern Commun. 2015; 31(4):285-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1063689. PMid:26170252.
Shane HC, Blackstone S, Vanderheiden G, Williams M, DeRuyter F. Using AAC technology to access the world. Assist Technol. 2011; 24(1):3-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2011.648716. PMid:22590795.
Suchato A, Chetsiri V, Skulareemit V, Thongprasert P, Punyabukkana P. Multilingual AAC on android. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology (START); 2011 July 5; Singapore. Singapore: START; 2011. p. 5.
Tenório JM, Hummel AD, Cohrs FVL, Pisa IT, Marin HF. Artificial intelligence techniques applied to the development of a decision-support system for diagnosing celiac disease. Int J Med Inform. 2011; 80(11):793-802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.08.001. PMid:21917512.
Vicente GLF, Caminha VLPS, Caminha AO, Felix PC. MeaVox: comunicação alternativa com dispositivos móveis. In: Proceedings of 5th ISAAC Brasil: Congresso Brasileiro de Comunicação Alternativa; 2013 Sept 2-4; Porto Alegre, RS. Porto Alegre: UFRGS; 2013. [cited 2015 July 15]. Avaliable from: http://www.ufrgs.br/teias/isaac/VCBCAA/pdf/115924_1.pdf
Wilkinson KM, Hennig S. The state of research and practice in augmentative and alternative communication for children with developmental/intellectual disabilities. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2007; 13(1):58-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.20133. PMid:17326111.